Could One Make the Case That Wilt Chamberlain Was a Better Basketball Player Than Michael Jordan? Because of..

Could One Make the Case That Wilt Chamberlain Was a Better Basketball Player Than Michael Jordan? Because of..

Championships are one, as many others have already stated. But that isn’t the sole explanation. Michael Jordan also has more superior individual achievements. In addition to winning more scoring titles, he has also won more MVPs, FMVPs, All-Stars, All-NBAs, and All-Defensive team honors. Naturally, Wilt was at a disadvantage because several awards—like the All-Defensive award—didn’t exist until 1968, by which time he was thirty-two years old. Wilt did, however, also compete against weaker opponents. Jordan competed against players like Dikembe Mutombo, Barkley, Karl Malone, Magic and Bird, and others. In contrast, Wilt faced less opposition when playing.

In addition, Wilt demonstrated a notable drop in his post-season performance relative to the regular season as well as a fall in his performance prior to and after the age of thirty. Wilt was averaging about 40–25–4 until he was 29. He averaged 20–21–6 after turning 30. Naturally, his assist average increased by 2, but his point average decreased by half and his rebounds decreased by 4. The postseason tale is comparable. Throughout his career, Wilt averaged 30–23–4 in the regular season. In the postseason, he had an average of 23-25-7. Thus, while his rebound percentage did marginally increase, his point average decreased by seven. It’s hard to rank him higher than Jordan because of his inconsistent performance.